<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Electronic Prescription &#187; electronic prescribing software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eprescriptionservices.com/tag/electronic-prescribing-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eprescriptionservices.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:58:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Study: N.C. ranks high in electronic prescription transfers</title>
		<link>http://www.eprescriptionservices.com/study-nc-ranks-high-electronic-prescription-transfers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eprescriptionservices.com/study-nc-ranks-high-electronic-prescription-transfers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-Prescription]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic Prescription]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic prescribing software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electronic prescribing systems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eprescriptionservices.com/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The percentage of medical prescriptions routed electronically from a physician’s office to a pharmacy hit 6.4 percent in North Carolina in 2008, giving the state a sixth-place national ranking, according to survey by St. Paul, Minn.-based Surescripts, a medical networking company.
Surescripts, formed as a result of the 2008 merger of RxHub and Surescripts, has been [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">The percentage of medical prescriptions routed electronically from a physician’s office to a pharmacy hit 6.4 percent in North Carolina in 2008, giving the state a sixth-place national ranking, according to survey by St. Paul, Minn.-based Surescripts, a medical networking company.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">Surescripts, formed as a result of the 2008 merger of RxHub and Surescripts, has been conducting the survey over the past four years to gauge the use of high-tech service delivery in medicine.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">North Carolina</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">, which ranked seventh nationally in 2007, was e-routing about 1.5 million, or 3.07 percent, of prescriptions that year. By 2008, Surescripts found, the volume had increased to 3.3 million, or 6.4 percent.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">Among the 50 states, Massachusetts ranked first in 2008, e-routing 20.5 percent of all eligible prescriptions, according to Surescripts.<span style="color: navy;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: black;">Above article published on </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/stories/2009/06/22/daily19.html" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: black;">http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/stories/2009/06/22/daily19.html</span></a></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"> </span></p>
<p><script src="http://w.sharethis.com/button/sharethis.js#tabs=web%2Cpost%2Cemail&amp;charset=utf-8&amp;style=default&amp;publisher=09b00708-1e2c-4346-a72e-d4c1efb1b8fb&amp;headerbg=%231883ad&amp;inactivebg=%23abc1de&amp;inactivefg=%230d0c02&amp;linkfg=%236192ab" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eprescriptionservices.com/study-nc-ranks-high-electronic-prescription-transfers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-Prescription Adoption Picking Up</title>
		<link>http://www.eprescriptionservices.com/eprescription-adoption-picking-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eprescriptionservices.com/eprescription-adoption-picking-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 11:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-Prescription]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic prescribing software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SureScripts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eprescriptionservices.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past two years, tens of thousands of U.S. clinicians have traded in their paper prescription pads for electronic prescribing software. 
By Marianne Kolbasuk McGee
InformationWeek
More doctors have traded in their paper prescription pads for e-prescribing over the last two years. However, the bulk of e-prescriptions are being generated by doctors using standalone e-prescribing software, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="background: white none repeat scroll 0%;"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">Over the past two years, tens of thousands of U.S. clinicians have traded in their paper prescription pads for electronic prescribing software. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">By Marianne Kolbasuk McGee<br />
InformationWeek</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">More doctors have traded in their paper prescription pads for e-prescribing over the last two years. However, the bulk of e-prescriptions are being generated by doctors using standalone e-prescribing software, not more comprehensive, integrated e-medical record systems, says a new study. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">Just two years ago, only about 19,000 U.S. doctors and other clinicians were prescribing drugs for patients electronically. That number has soared to 103,000, according to a new report from Surescripts, the nation&#8217;s largest e-prescribing network. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">Those e-prescriber figures represent doctors, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners mostly in physician practices, and don&#8217;t reflect clinicians in hospitals who order patient prescriptions using computerized physician order-entry systems. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">And while the e-prescription statistics also do not include clinicians processing transactions via other e-prescribing networks besides Surescripts, the company&#8217;s network is the dominant platform in the country supporting these transactions. Surescripts, which was founded in 2001 by the National Association of Chain Drug Stores and the National Community Pharmacists Association, merged last year with another major e-prescription player, RxHub, which was formed in 2001 by CVS Caremark, Express Scripts, and Medco. Surescripts&#8217; network supports e-prescribing in all 50 states. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">According to the company&#8217;s National Progress Report On E-Prescribing, there were 240 million e-prescriptions in 2008, double the volume in 2007. In just the first quarter of 2009, there were about 134 million e-prescription messages exchanged among e-prescribers, pharmacies, and payers in the United   States. Those messages include a number of exchanges, including doctors electronically confirming patients&#8217; prescription plan benefits with payers, checking patients&#8217; prescription history, and sending e-prescription orders to pharmacies. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">Surescripts has found that about 80% of standalone e-prescribing products allow prescribers to perform those three critical information exchanges, versus 30% of more comprehensive e-medical record systems that include e-prescribing features. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">The relative popularity of standalone software for e-prescribing, versus doctors using integrated e-medical record systems for processing e-prescriptions, reflects the scarce adoption of fully functional EMRs in U.S. doctors&#8217; offices right now. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">Still, the fact that more doctors have begun using electronic processes for writing patient prescriptions is a step in the right direction, since e-prescriptions can help cut costs and improve patient safety by automatically flagging potential drug allergies and interactions, reducing errors related to illegible handwriting, bettering adherence to benefit formularies, and stemming the number of callbacks between pharmacies and doctor offices. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">Key drivers in the increased volume of e-prescribing include new incentive programs by Medicare that recently went into effect rewarding doctors who prescribe electronically, as well as various educational and other programs by states, payers, and benefit providers pushing for more widespread adoption of e-prescribing. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">&#8220;There&#8217;s no question that incentive programs are working&#8221; to help propel adoption of e-prescribing, said a Surescripts spokesman. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">That could be an encouraging sign for the federal government in its plans to spend about $20 billion over the next several years on stimulus programs that include incentives for doctors and hospitals that use e-medical record systems. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">Above article published on</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=2170002  30&amp;cid=RSSfeed_TechWeb " target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=2170002</span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/news/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=2170002  30&amp;cid=RSSfeed_TechWeb " target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;">30&amp;cid=RSSfeed_TechWeb </span></a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial;"> </span></p>
<p><script src="http://w.sharethis.com/button/sharethis.js#tabs=web%2Cpost%2Cemail&amp;charset=utf-8&amp;style=default&amp;publisher=09b00708-1e2c-4346-a72e-d4c1efb1b8fb&amp;headerbg=%231883ad&amp;inactivebg=%23abc1de&amp;inactivefg=%230d0c02&amp;linkfg=%236192ab" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eprescriptionservices.com/eprescription-adoption-picking-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
